[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Xen-users] Re: What does xm top mean by the following:
- To: "pv" <vishnubhatt@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:03:29 +0200
- Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 03:04:27 -0700
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
- Thread-index: Acafvl4RTuDGqLVpTtiu+C4OE296PAAWvCqQ
- Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Re: What does xm top mean by the following:
One CPU will be able to give 100%, so 200% would be the
result of 2 cpu's [which can also be seen by you having 2 domains running - you
can only have one domain per CPU at any given time].
A CPU in this context is either anything the OS considers a
CPU, which means hyperthreaded "virtual" CPU's are counted, just like cores on a
dual core CPU. If you have one socket with two cores, which have hyperthreading,
the OS will see it as 4 CPU's. In my test-system, I've got two dual core
processors, and Xen sees that as 4 CPU's [I work for AMD, we don't do
HyperThreading - as we have shorter pipelines...].
If you take one server using 35% of one CPU, and move it to
a Xen-system, that domain would use 35% + x% of Hypervisor time - because
we're now administering the domain through Xen, which means a little bit of
extra work [or in extreme cases, quite a bit of extra work - depends entirely on
the domain].
And as I said earlier, the processor(s) may well work 100%
of the time, but the total in Xen-top isn't quite adding up to 100% * cpu_count,
because some time is "lost". I don't know this for sure, but I've seen it before
in other systems - some time isn't counted anywhere, although work is
done...
--
Mats
Thx Mats - I'm not quite sure what the %-ages mean i.e. what is 100% - is
it the sum of all the cpu(hw or hyperthreaded or vcpus) on all the
domains?
Take for .e.g a data center utilizing 35% of CPU for a particular server;
And, enter Xen: and you have installed 2 instead of one server running on
the same h/w w/ the hope of increasing utilization.
So, instead of 35%, one is expected to see 35%+x afa utilization (is this
true?)
It does not matter what base-line or metrics one is presented with (I'm
happy w/ the top presentation); as long as it is clear and easy to explain to
a 'CIO, CFO or VP-finance or an unsuspecting fellow-worker' - if you know
what I mean, I'll look forward to some documentation or an explanation to this
regard. Thx in advance.
--
On 7/1/06, pv
<vishnubhatt@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'm compiling some tarballs in both the guest domains below (fedora1
and fedora2), they're quite compute/cpu intensive, when I do a xm top, I get
the following, can someone tell me what does it mean to have CPU at 98.6% on
one guest domain while 84.9% in the other when the host/domain-0 is at 3.2%?
Thx in advance.
--
xentop - 20:38:02 Xen 3.0-unstable 3 domains: 2 running,
0 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 1038488k total,
1028408k used, 10080k free CPUs: 2 @
3391MHz NAME STATE
CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k)
MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) SSID Domain-0
-----r 41
3.2 131100 12.6 no
limit n/a
2 8
879 378 0
fedora1 ------
91 98.6 437652
42.1 442368
42.6 1
2
8 34 0
fedora2
-----r 60
84.9 437564 42.1
442368 42.6
1 2
7 36
0
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|