[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Re: preferred hardware for xen?


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Gabor Szokoli" <szocske@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:59:37 +0200
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:00:24 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=f9ybUgvQaaXwBhTkyDGNHslZH/NZAhP41Uzjld9A0iwYSJnpx3FeWe7h5xlM8dqyLIlx3AAKdJRi3MmjupbK7pP5yge2CzokCOUdL4bWXpCmGUHTM6zTDPuRfH2wVBoRRZMgac1d8Tb9pYb4e7gYcw/8+AgyXBsmyGOR1jSedzw=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

OK, so I did not check the xen-devel list properly, it is clearly
noted there that the new schedulers in unstable should solve the soft
lockup issue.
Still, I am open to suggestions on our pending xen-friendly server purchase:

On 8/14/06, Gabor Szokoli <szocske@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2, We plan to purchase a few new servers to slice up. Should we look
for something with vanderpool? Pacifica? Anything else we should
insist on to increase the probablility of xen working on it fine?
Anything we should make sure is not in them? More or fewer CPUs/cores
the better?


Thanks for any tips or advice:

Gabor Szokoli

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.