[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] multiple nic's with vlan -> bridge or bridge -> vlan

To: "thomas.vonsteiger@xxxxxxxxxx" <thomas.vonsteiger@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Molle Bestefich" <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:14:48 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:15:27 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l2/DAk+kntIyFrAyumznww3MFBtQ+9sr9d91XV14O/bo1BoaAZvpLkkZ1AdytR/TD5q6PWsCkSh3JLETreBWJ9EcH85n+4jHRpIaGnyn+BL3DqXrCBirYd9+Vy2fZCWk4d2MqznbucHE9CDiifqb4IjJ1nTT31aCdZh3HAEy5hY=
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

thomas.vonsteiger@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Is it better to build network configs for xen guest's with:

eth0 – vlan's – bridge's – domU's

eth1 – vlan's – bridge's – domU's



or



eth0 - bridge – vlan's –domU's

eth1 - bridge – vlan's –domU's



Assuming from your ASCII drawing that you terminate your VLANs inside
the domu's in the second configuration, I'd go with the first
configuration from a security point of view.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-users] multiple nic's with vlan -> bridge or bridge -> vlan
  - From: Javier Guerra

References:
- [Xen-users] multiple nic's with vlan -> bridge or bridge -> vlan
  - From: thomas.vonsteiger

Prev by Date: [Xen-users] Xen and Dapper
Next by Date: [Xen-users] Xen on MacBook Pro
Previous by thread: [Xen-users] multiple nic's with vlan -> bridge or bridge -> vlan
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-users] multiple nic's with vlan -> bridge or bridge -> vlan
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.