[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Error starting gentoo domU created with domi - lvm2 issue?
- To: Xen <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Villan <villan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 03:09:52 -0400
- Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:10:36 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=S9IZjoL1OYhC+kubFdCPs4VIDEcSLL6BvPLdaHE5zwiCvhUqaaBX/8+Ezq+pFKXZOr2qEhXMuRQhQvbYTvOo5Oecg3jkQUTKr3766S9G/1VnlLkOVVpBpzHVxqAT/fESA7EORii/DCWSYkJzYMB10g7v7Z2u0CsYivj0DPxM9Bw=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
I tired using ide, by changing the config file from sda to hda in both the root and disk locations, to no avail. The errors are the same, just with 'hda' instead of 'sda'.
For the record, lvm is indeed installed to sda7 - is there someone else who has a xen install running on lvm as well? When I first started this, I thought it was a common occurrance, but this seems to not be the case.
On 10/1/06, Henning Sprang <henning_sprang@xxxxxx> wrote:
Villan wrote:
> Hi Henning,
>
> Thanks for the clairification, makes a lot of sense.
You're welcome!
> Is there any reason
> to choose ide over scsi when dealing with virtual disks?
I don't really know about pros and cons.
>I am pretty
> sure scsi support is compiled directly into the domU kernel, here is the
> output:
>
> grep -i scsi domUconfig | grep -v "#" | less >
scsi.txt
>
> http://villan.us/scsi.txt <http://villan.us/scsi.txt>
>
Looks good. Hmm, I am too tired now for further ideas... maybe trying
IDE (at least a workaround). I'll have another look at the config tomorrow.
Henning
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
