[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] network IO dom0 and domU comparison

  • To: <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Larry Ludwig" <larrylud@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:45:05 -0400
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:44:29 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole; b=WS1XEKQlgPWHRSxK4saMQzTvswDrs0A02yy1pWEATHNREL95PZ9feHw5lpowMsdhNyTbSA26JDjg7JQ9r9v2vMY+AveANDDUdA5Iq7CmJDeFp4Rk0obw3n1rTZoQdHy/GysswlnJ/FqAJ+EI7uHA+SqMdpClGUkCWMLP+jsgd8g=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AceHULGyZ65T+GZRTqyANVPXyUZOqA==

Not what I was expecting with dom0 and domU performance difference.  The network is 100Mbit using sftp to transfer the file.  domU doesn't have iptables enabled in this test.  I assume the xennet driver for domU has some room for improvement?  Is this performance expected in a domU?
/home/samba/software/windows/mspublisher2003.zip                                                  100%  179MB   8.5MB/s   00:21
domU - dom0 iptables on
/home/samba/software/windows/mspublisher2003.zip                                                  100%  179MB   6.2MB/s   00:29
domU - dom0 iptables off
/home/samba/software/windows/mspublisher2003.zip                                                  100%  179MB   6.9MB/s   00:26   
Larry Ludwig
Empowering Media
1-866-792-0489 x600
Have you visited our customer service blog?
Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.