[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] One dedicated NIC per domU


  • To: "Jordi Espasa Clofent" <sistemes.llistes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Emre Erenoglu" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:06:10 +0200
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:06:46 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Qm2V3i1IKiXPNh+7iORQBtRA2Jb/CuDPuWFnyytQTMdnh9SRoSdoIfiys50AE2Ghv0lhCYMWHGJUVT4eCxBFGvsMKWvAzGWMMwCtfVk2y7xEo5smGUQafZREwn2Wz6s1XrMda47SOWjos0vXgOSxCmInkyCbRewbXdQnzFFAZag=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Well, as far as I know, you will just use bridged mode and have many xenbr 's around. You can then assign each to one DomU. Would this solve your problem?

Emre

On 8/25/07, Jordi Espasa Clofent <sistemes.llistes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jordi Espasa Clofent escribió:
>> If each nic has its own PCI controller, why don't you just hide those
>> controllers from Dom0 and export them to each DomU accordingly?
>
> Not in this case. I'm talking about a device which has several gigabit
> eth connection in same PCIe. I'm searching the concrete
> manufacturer/model to show you.

http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro1000pt_quad_server_adapter.htm

;)

--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



--
Emre Erenoglu
erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.