[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Why does domU Windows have to be re-registered after Xen 3.1.0 dom0 upgrade

  • To: Derek <xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Emre Erenoglu" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:13:38 +0200
  • Cc: Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:14:20 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GgwxPg/QAPqrIPkPk9OUPY9r35MikdVAjzTS0DJvTKsjxMNjA6f6aSMu9ELizPAhoZt23TJUvoDPM5MFGO1J2JqLrPgitvl+36oe5UDV+xXyim4itTJ8TRapngByQmDUZCiSK7ZxNftrNT14K5QcfQ14CrpURlAJWnTI8UnYGJo=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

The more important question can be, if XP lets you re-activate the OS or tells you to call Redmond?


On 9/11/07, Derek < xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,

Just wondering if anybody knows the answer to this mystery?

I upgraded my Dom0 from Xen 3.0.4 + kernel to Xen 3.1.0 + kernel 2.6.18-xen.

After the upgrade, my domU (WInXP home edition) popped up a message saying that it needed to be re-registered with Microsoft, owing to significant changes in the hardware environment on which it is running.  Something about windows genuine advantage (ie. they suspect it's a pirate copy?)

Just wondering...  Does anybody know what changes these might be?  There's nothing obvious that I can tell, but something about my new Xen 3.1.0 environment is different enough to upset Microsoft.  It's the same memory size, same peripherals etc.

The only thing I can think of is PAE versus non-PAE.  My new 3.1.0 installation is PAE, my old one was not (as far as I know anyway).   Could that be it?

Not critical that I get to the bottom of this, but I'm curious.


Xen-users mailing list

Emre Erenoglu
Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.