[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Why does domU Windows have to be re-registered after Xen 3.1.0 dom0 upgrade
- To: Derek <xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Emre Erenoglu" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:21:09 +0200
- Cc: Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:21:57 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Q4k8LqoIAgYkv74BkD21oEgAdhurDrjviY45oQ7TCN3vaxKlpc9QiN7tgHFHZSPMp20kE+lpd73QI0woyaM3HZcxmMScyjp58AXQjk2nsy3hiXrVa96obIB802Fw7iN++sLLeO6ip4D47fCrk2MSZh6HTe2naprccihf+XDGkZE=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
So let's hope that you won't run out of these "activation" rights for successive Xen upgrades...
Emre
On 9/11/07, Derek <
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi,
It let me reactivate just fine. Didn't even require me to re-enter the many-digit code on the sticker, it just said to click on the re-activate link, paused about a minute, and then announced that activation was successful.
Derek
On 9/11/07, Emre Erenoglu <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
The more important question can be, if XP lets you re-activate the OS or tells you to call Redmond?
Emre
Hi all,
Just wondering if anybody knows the answer to this mystery?
I upgraded my Dom0 from Xen 3.0.4 + kernel 2.6.16.33-xen to Xen 3.1.0 + kernel 2.6.18-xen.
After the upgrade, my domU (WInXP home edition) popped up a message saying that it needed to be re-registered with Microsoft, owing to significant changes in the hardware environment on which it is running. Something about windows genuine advantage (ie. they suspect it's a pirate copy?)
Just wondering... Does anybody know what changes these might be? There's nothing obvious that I can tell, but something about my new Xen 3.1.0 environment is different enough to upset Microsoft. It's the same memory size, same peripherals etc.
The only thing I can think of is PAE versus non-PAE. My new 3.1.0 installation is PAE, my old one was not (as far as I know anyway). Could that be it?
Not critical that I get to the bottom of this, but I'm curious.
Derek.
_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
-- Emre Erenoglu erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
-- Emre Erenoglu erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|