[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] sles10sp1 bonding - bridging or routing

  • To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Remigiusz Stachura" <remigiusz.stachura@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:08:40 +0200
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:59:44 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=bgcUqu1+oNGciz5cRwyPHDJlFCpBnovehJBrNZJ0SzkNUDR25KusOpT4MuxnFg/uOKD9SolQFrtQjPsNSZLILxlEV8wOK9A2NUgl5pHoqqbt8FsQF34fY2PL7cNff4tJyZAy8dPsHOySQD1gV1Q0VPnuBU2kaCcEB8kqV4TtGfw=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

I tried to use Xen 3.0.4+ with the bond0 device in active-backup mode
(eth0+eth1) on SLES10SP1 using standard Xen network scripts
(network-bridge, vif-bridge). After rebooting server I got interfaces:
bond0, xenbr0, vif0.0,peth0,...;
bond0 and xenbr0 - both of them had the same IP address and MAC
address!!!. Is it normal situation? (if there is no bonding I got
eth0, xenbr0, vif0.0 ...  and only the eth0 has IP address.)

What schould I choose for bonding: use of bridging scipts or routing scripts?
(In my configuration Dom0 and DomUs have IP addresses from the same
network segment).

When I tried to use Xen routing script for bonded eth0+eth1interfaces
I got any vif0 or peth0 interface. Schould I modify that script or add
there bond0 as a parameter?


Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.