[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] PV on Centos 5 64-bit
Jens-Petter Salvesen wrote: Oh, no. A fully virtualized VM can certainly run a Xen enabled kernel (barring some oddnesses with particular kernels). But the initrd certainly needs the right drivers to do so. I think you'll find that a fully virtual VM needs different device drivers than a para-virtualized one.Nico wrote:Jens-Petter Salvesen wrote:Hi,I'm having a very difficult time getting paravirtualized Xen running on Centos 5 64bit and I'm hoping someone can spot what I'm doingwrong.I've been attemping to do this for a few days now and I'm really not seeing what I'm doing wrong. Here's what I've done: 1. Installed Centos 5 64-bit on the Dom0 2. Installed a fully virtualized DomU running Centos 5 64-bit.3. Created a new configuration file that will create aparavirtualized >DomUWhy aren't you using virt-install? Did you want to duplicate thevirtual system entirely? I would prefer to be able to select upon boot-time if the VM is going to run as fully virtualized or paravirtualized. That would enable me to evaluate both solutions. I thought that it was possible to just make two different config files that boot two different kernels for the same VM? To my understanding, a fully virtualized VM must _not_ run a xen-enabled kernel while a paravirtualized VM _requires_ a compatible xen-enabled kernel. Is this correct? Got it. One thing I've done when doing a restoration from a system image, to get the grub set up, is to delete the kernel from the guest domain and do a virt-install "upgrade" on top of it.Also, if you're using pygrub, you don't have to state a kernel. I don'tknow if it breaks things, but it's confusing at best. I know. That kernel= statement is just a leftover from debugging. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |