[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] CentOS 5.1 & Xen 3.2
Sadique Puthen wrote: I say RHEL/Centos 5.1 works nice on x86_64. Actually, C5.0 works nice, but 5.1 is a big improvement, including support for 32-on-64. Don't be surprised if the xen rpm version still says 3.0 though.--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:Purely from other forums where people were having issues with the X86_64 platform. Will give it a go then. Does anybody know when 3.2 will make it into CentOS ?This wouldn't happen since rebasing to xen-3.2 in centos5 is going to break a lot of existing production server implementations. The biggest issue is that XenSource does not guarentee ABI compatability between the HV & userspace between major releases. Isn't that also the case with RHEL5.0/Xen3.0 -> RHEL5.1/Xen3.1? Regards, Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |