[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] building xen


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Luke <secureboot@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:49:14 -0500
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:50:17 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=HXZ38enuGNwuohT+suxg8bzL7DOGxnKwVNf5jQQubg3aF9bT/i7W9XklcB+yjyYU6Yj67n57qan5/Foi7VHZrrtW3D0GnLRwX6oW6yWilh5AD/qz/h2OELpVmdIeeSQe/1JThTZzhCPicemPghTrB5v/8KiQrphTVDcfSeXhsCo=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>


On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Todd Deshane wrote:

This thread and similar ones would be worth looking into to get a
better understanding:

http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2008-02/ msg00066.html


That's helpful, I just want to be sure I understand a key point from this - the kernels at kernel.org cannot run as dom0 kernels?

I suppose this is expected, since paravirt is an option, but not "dom0" support or the like...

Sounds like the path of least resistance here is to download a fedora or ubuntu kernel, get their source, and apply patches from there.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.