[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Release 0.8.9 of GPL PV drivers for Windows
On Saturday April 26 2008 10:12:33 pm James Harper wrote: > Hmmm... uninstall.bat is a work in progress and probably shouldn't have > been included. I suspect that if you rebooted after running > uninstall.bat but before running install.bat you would have had an > unbootable system. Well, for the first time since 0.8.4, I got winxp to boot w/ /gplpv, using 0.8.9. I booted w/o /gplpv and then ran uninstall.bat. Because of the warning above, I ran install.bat right away w/o a reboot. The final screen came up and said all drivers were updated except xennet, which was 'Ready to Use'. Then I rebooted w/ /gplpv, and the Find New Hardware Wizard came up automatically and guided me through installing xennet w/o a hitch. I had previously disabled all the new features in Device Manager's Xen Net Device Driver Properties' Advanced Tab. (This was done by copying over the 0.8.4 files so I could boot w/o a BSOD.) An 'iperf -c dom0-name -t 60' came up with 27.3 Mbits/s. I then proceeded to turn on each feature one at a time in the Advanced tab, and rebooting w/ /gplpv. Device Manager invariably hung after enabling each feature, which caused the reboot to hang. All measurements are with vcpus=2, unless noted otherwise. After adding enabling Checksum Offload, iperf gave 30.5 Mb/s. After adding setting 61440 for Large Send Offload, iperf gave 25.3 Mb/s. After adding enabling Scatter/Gather, iperf gave 25.1 Mb/s. So there are minor variations with and w/o the various options, but on the whole, much better than the last version I could test, 0.8.4. From James' original post: > From the testing I've done, on a UP windows DomU, with iperf options '-l > 1M -w 1M', with the iperf server running in Dom0, I get TX throughput of > about 1.5Gbits/second and RX throughput of about 0.5Gbits/second. When I > tried it under SMP it worked, but the performance was horrible. Probably > best if you don't run it under SMP for the moment :) Doing 'iperf -c dom0-name -l 1M -w 1M' gives 28.8 Mb/s, and reversing the direction (winxp as iperf server) gives 30.2 Mb/s. Going down to vcpu=1, dom0 as server gives 27.1 Mb/s, and domu as server gives 35.7 Mb/s, so there is not a lot of difference between 1 and 2 vcpus for me. Nice improvements. I will test disk i/o w/ iometer later. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |