[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Allocate more Memory than real


  • To: deshantm@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Artur Baruchi" <mail.baruchi@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:46:42 -0300
  • Cc: Steffen Heil <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:47:19 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=UfiFw8X0/AE20RK3E6GliBv+aohVXEL2R3LDkdlSn+MmFftYcxnTYQjxxgQ7NKibyv eAQuFzdcDm0k6f+DQORKSXyoYj+u0tsPwVy3X1R1RzYCh7NV/Ywo0PMWtTbzwwHMm3BK iathMnIy9lwrYhWKhLkYlK34wWEC4kPLRWcYg=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

I did the same thing using xen 3.2 latter. I retrieve some memory and
create new guests. The sum of all domU's memory is greater than real
memory.
And, I saw something nice... when I return some memory to xen the
guest see this and update the memory available to the SO, for example,
If the guest has 1gb and I use commands like "free" or "top", I see
1gb. When I return 512M to xen, this commands show me an updated value
of 512M of available memory.

So... Does xen implement some kind of Hotplug Memory for
paravirtualized guests?

And thanks for the last paper... I got some ideas from there...

Att.
Artur Baruchi


On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Todd Deshane <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Xen 3.3 supports memory overcommitment now.
>
> see:
> http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2008/08/27/xen-33-feature-memory-overcommit/
>
> Cheers,
> Todd
>
>
> --
> Todd Deshane
> http://todddeshane.net
> check out our book: http://runningxen.com
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.