[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Still confused about bridging (I think)
Javier Guerra wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:42 PM, David Dyer-Bennet <dd-b@xxxxxxxx> wrote:I know I'm confused about *something*, because packets aren't getting through. The hardware has two NICs, eth0 connects to the corporate lan on 192.168.1.14, and to a private cluster lan on 172.17.0.1. In dom0, I can reach systems on both lans. In a guest on 172.17.1.2, I can't reach anything. Nothing in 172.17, nothing in 192.168.1. The guest is domain 9, called vl01. In dom0 A bridge, xenbr0 (specified in my control files for the domains), is set up to let everybody talk to everywhere. [root@prcapp02 xen]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes xenbr0 8000.2ed4b2e93fd1 no vif9.0 vif7.0 tap0 peth0 vif0.0where's the 'way out' from xenbr0? IOW, is peth0 connected to a real NIC? Yes, that's the "real" nic. Xen seems to have renamed the interfaces. i think you should set two bridges, one connected to eth0 (192.168.1.14) , and the other to eth1 (172.17.0.1), then if you want a DomU on 172.17.x.x, connect it's vif to the second bridge. A bridge is a MAC-layer device, it never even looks at the IP address in the packet (the packet need not, in fact, be IP at all). So I'd need a pretty detailed explanation of how this might help before it's even worth trying. -- David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |