[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] More vcpus than physical cores and hvm


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Alexandre Biancalana" <biancalana@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:32:32 -0300
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:33:21 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=CR75Nv4DLzgnp8nH3PpakEPWzVBz/1p/OtNjWWGaQ75fFL2WarKh+jFDjASo3Vkiuz 6mfjYS/4T/uC113L3G0zrtzftLHqO6zvEcSuZQlXd7ebaYHkR6UTpItXp4B6WSUYJwPl t+q0NxGV2MDC0j0rrX3Yj4XaTLnLpyvgNWZ0Q=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi List,

  I have a server with two QuadCore 2.93Ghz processors and 16GB Ram,
running Debian etch and Xen 3.2-1.

  Until yesterday I had in this server 2 hvm virtual machines, running
w2k, 4 vcpus each without any problem, the use of each virtual machine
rarely reach 70%. Today I cloned one of the virtual machines and
started they with 2 vcpus, right after I start this new guest the use
of cpus on the others guest vms showed by task manager climb to 50%
(kernel time)  and If I start another new guest with 2 vcpus, the
first two guests reach close to 100% of cpu use

  Can I have more vcpus than physical cores on Xen ?? There's
something to do with hvm ? Have some configuration (cpu scheduling) to
improve this situation ? Someone have a similar setup ?

 Best Regards,

Alexandre

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.