Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance

[Stefan de Konink <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote:

> i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a
> GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage!

My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the links
10GE ->  1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance.

> Why is FC faster than iSCSI? Ah, it s because of the protocol.

Non-sence.

> >  and preferably stability comparisons.
>
> open-iscsi has no stable releases yet. aoetools do have. There are also
> many users complaining about iscsi-kernel-issues....

...there is more than open-iscsi, in targets and initiators. (+ OS'es)


Stefan


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users