[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote: > i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a > GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage! My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the links 10GE -> 1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance. > Why is FC faster than iSCSI? Ah, it s because of the protocol. Non-sence. > > and preferably stability comparisons. > > open-iscsi has no stable releases yet. aoetools do have. There are also > many users complaining about iscsi-kernel-issues.... ...there is more than open-iscsi, in targets and initiators. (+ OS'es) Stefan _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |