[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Distributed xen or cluster?
- To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Rob Beglinger <rbeglinger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:25:13 -0600
- Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:26:06 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IpQ76rppM0H9Dmwt4WKPINrs6zvacU8vR62MxTh+ZLme7EWGyA9UcuxQTuo9rX+uE7 LF9+i3QAvuS7cgPB4H7xRskMbSi7fIYtHS7MQ0zS25i6YOYZVK1sFRTab263O5uzmoxJ IqtuE4kc141mH2rV+8wRS9B9orPIHq/Xj7pnQ=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Something like this?
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Open_Topics_For_Discussion?action="">
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:20 PM, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> FWIW, I've had much better success with OCFS2's fencing methods than with
> GFS.ï My OCFS2 nodes, when they lose connectivity to the rest of the
I've looked at ZFS and sure love the sounds of that. Not sure if they have an open source version, I thought I did see one though. When I was reading up on it, it sounded a lot simpler and had a lot of additional features.
> Also, I'd say the overall point is that there's no "magic bullet" that's
> going to knock out all of your redundancy concerns at the same time.ï Xen
Right, I've picked that up based on the replies :). I can still fantasize though, of a cluster of virtual servers running OS's which are totally redundant. What a perfect world that will be! And I'm SURE it's only a matter of time.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
