[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] I want to know if.....


  • To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:44:58 +0100
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:46:04 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=frWn8fawTyFxLMIYcn+ZGI9A+tTEH9P5oZBnel5SnC7Bo1epptcsnpWYdXgNjmDUsg lK4h+YBMadNm5YnUk1/w4JLB2u+V+T1WILSLh/wfAGJesydCB1uBAXcFukLTbuTPyO8J v8id2/0pmKyjvAp6v10F9z4UWB6BKnXmhAS5c=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

2009/3/2 Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Can you say that for production servers is better xen rather than kvm?
>
> If you're using RHEL like I do, then from support perspective the
> obvious answer is (currently) yes, as Redhat provides suppot for xen
> guests, but not for kvm guests.

I'm using debian lenny.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.