[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] RE: Another question about msi.


  • To: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:21:28 +0800
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:22:51 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcmuUwu0QyhQ31rBQ4uNsJw+qV9XWQAJwusA
  • Thread-topic: Another question about msi.

 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carsten Schiers [mailto:carsten@xxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: 2009年3月27日 4:40
>To: xen-users
>Cc: Jiang, Yunhong
>Subject: Another question about msi.
>
>Antoher question regarding MSI support.
> 
>When I have a motherboard where two PCIe slots and one PCI 
>slot share an 
>interrupt when using current
>Xen and kernel with GSI, when I now use Xen 3.4-unstable and latest 
>kernel, it will use the MSI (as the
>Two PCIe slots are occupied by realtek NICs and their modules are MSI 
>aware). Two different MSI show up 
>in /proc/interrupts. 
>
>Does this now mean that I can pass-through the PCI slot into a 
>pv DomU, 
>because the GSI is now exclusively
>used by the PCI slot (what I could not do before, as NICs shared GSI 
>with the network cards)?

I suspect even shared-interrupt devices can be assigned to different guest.

BTW, if a device can be assigned to a guest are determined by many factor, like 
FLR support etc (at least for HVM domain).

>
>For your Info: Xen 3.3.1 and latest kernel will not work for me.
>
>Thanks,
>Carsten.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.