Re: [Xen-users] Is LVM really that much slower than Container?

["Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Tim Kaufmann <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 13.04.2009 um 21:52 schrieb Tom Brown:
>
>> Anyhow, sorry for the digression. I can't remember what the numbers were
>> supposed to demonstrate. :)
>
> We were trying to find out whether it's the dom0 or the domU2 (LVM-stored XP
> SP3) that underperforms. Now that we know that dom0 is ok, what's next?

>From that result my guess is that your Xen installation is somehow messed up :)
If you have time, I suggest you try Centos 5.3, with either bundled
Xen (3.1 plus redhat-specific changes) or Xen 3.3.1 from Gitco. It
shows good results on my system.

Regards,

Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users