[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Does I/O from Dom0 skip the PV backend drivers ?
- To: Joe Armstrong <Joe.Armstrong@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Paolo Victor <paolovictor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:17:10 -0300
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:18:25 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=loOGzwBJg/k0yaMGhM6xA8nDypLdaMKf6YMbTP2KOvvCt+pC9aKua/jqKzZ3/BpBO8 BOIg2a69j4VoS8vUHAagvtbu9xcjtxCq9dwroBbqqswCeq9QL03KIoaOiMeqIvbVqXpy JwmjNKrStId6Z5C67Q1FKXsnQI35v8p1oBmao=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Hi,
From what I've read at [1]:
When network packets are received by the NIC, the NIC will
raise an interrupt. While the NICâs device driver in the driver do-
main may directly access the NIC, all interrupts in the system must
ïrst go through the hypervisor. The hypervisor receives the inter-
rupt, determines that the NIC is owned by the driver domain, and
then generates a virtual interrupt for the NICâs device driver in the
driver domain. The device driver receives the virtual interrupt, pro-
cesses the packets received by the NIC and sends them to the Eth-
ernet bridge. The Ethernet bridge demultiplexes the packet based
on its Ethernet address and delivers it to the appropriate netback
interface. The netback driver then sends the packet to the netfront
driver in the guest domain over an I/O channel. The netfront driver
then delivers the packet to the guest operating system as if it had
come directly from the NIC. The process is basically reversed to
send packets from the guest domains.
So if when they say "processes" at "The device driver
receives the virtual interrupt, processes the packets received by the
NIC" they mean "receive if the destination is Dom0" then yes, it does
perform I/O directly - at least on the receive path.
Actually, running the benchmark at Dom0 was how they "simulated" a direct I/O on [2] :-)
Please correct me if I'm mistaken. I hope it helps,
~Paolo
[1] http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2009/HPL-2009-25.pdf
[2] http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix08/tech/full_papers/santos/santos_html/
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Joe Armstrong <Joe.Armstrong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am trying to determine the amount of overhead (if any) that a PV guest
incurs as compared to running on bare metal. ÂI was thinking of running some
performance tests on both a bare metal system and then in a PV guest â but I
only have one machine. ÂI am trying to figure out if Âbooting from a xen to
non-xen kernel is needed in order to get real numbers.
So the question boils down to â When Dom0 performs I/O does it go directly
to the physical device driver or does it also route through the PV backend
drivers ?
Also, my assumption is that the xen hypervisor has no role in any I/O
operations so it being present or not should have almost no impact on I/O
performance.
Thanks for any info.
Joe
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-I-O-from-Dom0-skip-the-PV-backend-drivers---tp23302372p23302372.html
Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
