[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] lvm


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Michael David Crawford <mdc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 01:05:02 -0700
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 25 May 2009 01:05:50 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

I'm about to install a whole bunch of DomUs, each with a different operating system.

It's definitely faster not to use a file-backed block device. LVM is more flexible than partitions, and partitions are somewhat tedious (and dangerous) to set up.

Is there any *measurable* overhead of using LVM as opposed to simple partitions?

The two concerns I have are, how quickly can the physical disk sector number be calculated given the sector offsite in the device (either partition or LVM), and whether LVMs can be made physically contiguous.

Mike
--
Michael David Crawford
mdc@xxxxxxxxx

   prgmr.com - We Don't Assume You Are Stupid.

      Xen-Powered Virtual Private Servers: http://prgmr.com/xen

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.