[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] lvm


  • To: Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:28:19 +0700
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 25 May 2009 01:28:59 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Michael David Crawford <mdc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there any *measurable* overhead of using LVM as opposed to simple
> partitions?

>From someone in Redhat:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2008-01/msg00359.html

>
> The two concerns I have are, how quickly can the physical disk sector number
> be calculated given the sector offsite in the device (either partition or
> LVM),

Why would you even want to know?

> and whether LVMs can be made physically contiguous.

Excluding effects of software/hardware RAID, it is contiguous by
default when possible.

-- 
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.