[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-

  • To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: fmb fmb <feedmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:17:22 +0300
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:18:09 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QMzehMLjN+NnHPL0Wsss8/8MJNcASXiaYGPa+aV2i3XTUhz+Zdvf+/8runca+6dwc+ bIhsnjKROoxLtrbvU5IFak1aPpjR/9XCDgK4vZdWqRjPnkETZ4z+6NS2VE+LqS+rEXT4 kWzqsfyfbp7p7MdqnrB2waoBUL8pBNd5m46w0=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

thnx :)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:48 AM, fmb fmb<feedmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is it still advisable to use xvda instead of sda in the fstab and cfg files?

It is recommended. One of the reasons is that newer pv_ops kernel will
silently use xvda regardless of what you put on cfg file :P

> Is this "Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table" normal?

If you assign domU storage directly as xvda2, then it's normal.


Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.