[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] howto re-create XEN network bridge?


  • To: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:08:03 +0200
  • Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:09:03 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=m5QQYp6o7U/HqkhqiC9eeUm3DeexYyZg/EZiBKnyaNneqk28plepa8unSZcW0TnNTQ +l7THYC/lPL/BShNE53T84OAZe/c09frAfi2XGVcKCJdJm0FAFrgKBNRh5CSWqdvxq6p Em3dD5StU1hV8dynfHZR9eFOum5boHwsS1Ra0=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here's the output of brctl show:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> root@zaxen01:[~]$ brctl show
>>>> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
>>>> xenbr0          8000.feffffffffff       no              vifpict0
>>>>                                                        vifandr0
>>>>                                                        vifzafe0
>>>>                                                        vifserv0
>>>>                                                        vifraft0
>>>>                                                        vifplut0
>>>>                                                        viferis0
>>>>                                                        vifbyra0
>>>>                                                        vifanim0
>>>>                                                        vifacti0
>>>>                                                        peth0
>>>>                                                        vif0.0
>>>>
>>>
>>> You can try by sniffing packets on uplink physical interface (should
>>> be peth0 in your case). Test with simple packets (like ping) and snoop
>>> it with tcpdump (something like "tcpdump -n -i peth0 icmp"). That
>>> would at least tell you whether packets can get to physical interface
>>> or not.
>>>
>>> If the traffic is there but somehow you still have problems, the
>>> source of problem might be elsewhere and not in your bridge setup.
>>> Might be switch blocking ports with many MACs, or router caching old
>>> MAC addresses.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fajar
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>

Are there any limits on the amount of network interfaces one can setup on XEN?

I'm really at whit's end with this problem and don't know how to fix it.


-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
CEO, SoftDux Hosting
Web: http://www.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.