[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/noise? runs stable/quiet under non-xen kernel.
- To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
- From: mail ignored <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:32:59 -0800
- Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:33:36 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XB4kV0MNu6/F61xCUX7mkElcnI8H/geMQCPhBKk8137kwi5Noi+w0lL2y9SW75EIlQ gPiOt0nfkjSqfaEVmd9cBJUMhl5B1rmaf/0c40LfSnKn55jsi9+l8h2qy/hPNyqlHKCJ v/hnXlUjmi+dAYtEFNO/8JQyNzWwO16ajQYrc=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
hi,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> like Andy pointed out on xen-devel, the xen.gz option is called
> dom0_max_vcpus nowadays.
>
> I verified dom0_max_vcpus=1 works OK with Xen 3.4.2.
I've just been told @novell bugzilla,
"Please be also advised that dom0_max_vcpus=1 is not recommended (and
not supported); a minimum of 2 should be set here."
Any thoughts/comments? Should it be used @ =1, or not? confusing, atm.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
