[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] xen cloud - shared storage question


  • To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:03:08 -0800
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:04:05 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=key2; d=atlasnetworks.us; c=nofws; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=YV+lgz397DvakOUwGdnCZY3MWoFAT4Wr5mm4NP53x+Kg9efe2/Yr/290SXv3 B9uLJqHnr6+CV1wAzzLU+M3zvCasOcghX0iMx5lqsG5q5ZbI58Wspe3zq /vIV9SSHma621N3XWKlaY6M5FisiwKkyMSJXsmoeGftQ/AP0qCvlks=;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcqphJihDcDIQpGhRwi6fOiBmz08QgA7fJuw
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] xen cloud - shared storage question

I would avoid this.  Most of this kind of storage technology is reliant on local CPU power.  By putting it on boxes that are also doing other work, you’re going to end up increasing the latency of the storage.  Plus, I don’t believe this scales past two boxes – centralized, dedicated SAN stuff is pretty much crucial if you’re looking to roll out 300 VMs across 20 compute nodes.

 

Best Regards,

Nathan Eisenberg

Sr. Systems Administrator - Atlas Networks, LLC

office: 206.577.3078 | suncadia: 206.210.5450

www.atlasnetworks.us | www.suncadianet.com

 

From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rudi Ahlers
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 4:36 AM
To: Ahmed Kamal
Cc: Peter den Hartog; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] xen cloud - shared storage question

 

 

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Ahmed Kamal <email.ahmedkamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The standard setups needs a third shared storage box exposing either iscsi or NFS, if you don't want to do any hacks

 

 

As matter of interest, with today's more powerful servers, is it possible to setup a "shared storage box" on the cloud servers themselves? i.e. you have 2x dual Core i7 + 12GB RAM + 4x400GB SAS HDD's, then you setup glusterFS on both boxes and create an active-active sync "NAS" - and the VM's run straight from there. 

 

This, to me, sounds like a theory, and a very good one at that. But, how does / would it work in practice? 

 

the VM's have a direct connection to the shared storage, and the shared storage sync between the servers on a separate GB link. 

 

Has anyone done this? Is it possible?

Why would I want to go this router? Simple, to save space, energy, costs (which can be used elsewhere: marketing , sales, software, etc) & carbon footprint. The processing power we have in one single 1U server today is far better than what we used to get in much larger servers 3 years ago. 


--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.