[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] AoE vs iSCSI
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Markus Hochholdinger > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:37 PM > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Chris 'Xenon' Hanson > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] AoE vs iSCSI > > i testet AoE and iSCSI. AoE scales very bad! If you have more than 10 AoE devices > over one NIC you get on one AoE device bad througput and a high load on the system. > iSCSI with lots (testet with over 200) of LUNs will performe very good. I was able to > get a little more than 100MByte/s over one 1GBit/s NIC with iSCSI! All other things being equal, one protocol should not outperform the other by such a wide margin. Your results obviously will depend on the quality of the implementation--i.e. whether you've chosen one of the open source AoE targets, or you are using a storage appliance with AoE, which OS/driver version, etc. AoE performance is also highly dependent on your network. Always use jumbo frames and hardware flow control. If you have a switch that doesn't handle these, get a new switch. -Jeff _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |