[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Xen-users] rebased openSUSE Xen dom0 Patches
- To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 06:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc:
- Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 06:17:49 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mPvLkcdkNiZypC1JwJMPe1HpwXYowG3K8EAZejJ1gib7dNFAiDfupHBRJna9g87XC7ZVm7OC/0lr0MyxS8Kgysl8OnHCpiakJliezF52NL+9R8XY+9UWrCle++6B3SURdNvItqUM0CG182PYsguhffK+xJX/pliaFeLW8FJ7IFI=;
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
> So, Is it possible know to used them on a plain vanilla kernel 2.6.31.X and get > a Xen kernel pv_ops,like if I grub it from Jeremy tree?
I believe Michael Young is doing a stuff kind of that for Fedoras. It's not easy i would guess.
Boris.
--- On Sat, 4/10/10, Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Mike Viau <viaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] rebased openSUSE Xen dom0 Patches To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Saturday, April 10, 2010, 8:59 PM
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:17:26 +0300 <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi,
Does this consider to be oldsyle Xen or the new pv_ops?
Oldstyle (Xenlinux)
As I used before some of this patches - there consider to be oldstyle.
Thanks
Sassy
-M
Got a phone? Get Hotmail & Messenger for mobile!
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|