[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] LVM's inside of Domu's


  • To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:09:55 -0700
  • Cc: Donny Brooks <dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:11:04 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=QbGYuOR5ZN85dp8Kg5EoldZV0FTS/tWewld/gg3CSPThjU5nuFHrrQQHnjs5jQUKPh VXZshV4sKfkyJc+27ImRHGs+YdOVqA+SD0uQCdyuSx7Wujsi1cTOEriYf5udLUOzxUZL D6gBit6hMbU3d5xDtcna20O140ldL6bwSkyIA=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>



On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Donny Brooks <dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Back when I started messing with Xen (a year or so ago), I read where it was not good to have a domu setup with LVM inside of it if the storage on the Dom0 was LVM also.
you could, if the VG on dom0 have different name from domU.

> and see filesystem
> possible slowdown?

If you have RHN subscription you might be able to ask them what the
performance penalty given by LVM is. AFAIK is negligible.

--
Fajar


I've done a lot of testing on LVM performance and it's almost alway as fast or within 10% of the speed of non-LVM at the worst. I too think the benefits outweight the negatives.

Grant McWilliams
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.