[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Re: 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 vs 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 on debian


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Dmitriy Sirant <lex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:18:49 +0300
  • Connect(): No such file or directory
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 11 May 2010 00:20:16 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

11.05.10 09:52, Israel Garcia ÐÐÑÐÑ:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Tapas Mishra<mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
 From my experience I tell it will be better to use a newer version.A
day before yesterday my xen daemon failed to start.I am still tracing
it as what went wrong.Better use the xen-4 and compile the binary if
you want to use the latest version it will be better than what you
mentioned.
Hi Tapas,

So, you recommend me to install a fresh up2date debian without any of
this xen kernel, download xen-4 and compile it? Is this better than
used the latest kernel debian lenny brings from repos
(2.6.26-[1][2]-xen-amd64)?

I appreciate any information, experience about this of you guys.


In testing you can found linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64, it's easy backport to stable and nice work about month with self compiled xen-4.0

WBR,
Dmitriy Sirant



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.