[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] DomU - network performance and possibilities (HVM, PVM, pci-passthru, stubdom, PV on HVM...)
- To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
- From: lei yang <yanglei.fage@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 17:42:15 +0800
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 18 May 2010 02:43:52 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QuiPmVgtlywn6eE/wjpAhACNyy58Z4zo4YMCDyj2qR72aU06dEf13GLVXvyuOkKvrq TdPwB5Sd2cgfuUSeRmCZ3Pvy7O2TMeO/ps9htU3H7ajEno8OXdgTqMK6FbjDIFLLKLoY gml1PmU34kvtyWpx7BEDadBhwHNdQIRQiQ/NM=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
Matej: I didn't get your initial post to xen-users because I got (automatically) unsubscribed
from the list, due to my email provider getting blacklisted because of some spam problems,
but now I subscribed again..
To answer your questions:
1) No, it's not possible to use VirtIO with Xen.
2) Yes, it's possible to use PV-on-HVM drivers in the guest with pvops dom0.
3) Take a look at: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenLinuxPVonHVMdrivers
Did you already make some benchmarks? If you need good latency then I think
PCI passthrough will help a lot there.. or Xen netchannel2.
Which one will be better for thoughput, pci passthrogh or netchanel2?
Thanks Lei
-- Pasi
Original email from Matej:
Hi,
I want to (need to) do a network performance analysis/benchmark of
various Xen networking solutions (analyzing the pros and cons of network
infrastructure virtualisation) on top of Xen 4.0.
So far I have Xen 4.0 running with various Dom0 kernels (git stable
2.6.32.11, git stable 2.6.31.13, mercurial 2.6.18.8, Debian distribution
2.6.26-2xen...want try some newer forward ported Xen kernel too).
AFAIK, there are these possibilities for DomU "architecture".
1. DomU as classic emulated HVM.
2. DomU as classic PVM (pv_ops kernel and Xen kernel)
3. DomU as classic emulated HVM with Xen PV drivers (don't know whether
these work with pv_ops Dom0, but for that case I have the 2.6.18.8 Xen
linux)
4. DomU as classic PVM with pass-thru PCI NICs
5. DomU as classic HVM with pass-thru PCI NICs (don't have IOMMU capable
HW :( )
6. DomU as HVM with stubdom (according to various papers, this should be
a bit faster than classic HVM DomU)
7. DomU as HVM with virtio drivers (is this possible in xen4.0?)
I'm interested in the latency and bandwidth performance in phys-DomU and
DomU-DomU scenarios (I have own tool for network latency benchmarking
and for bandwidth there's the Iperf :) ). Also I will try to experiment
a bit with the CPU pinning and schedulers in these scenarios.
Also would like to test and testbench OpenSwitch as linux-bridge
replacement (but I'm afraid I will not have time for this).
So my questions are:
1. Is possible to use VirtIO with XEN 4.0 (as another approach on the
PV-on-HVM)?
2. Is possible to use the Xen HVM DomU PV drivers (unmodified drivers?)
with pvops Dom0?
3. If you have some ideas or hints, I will be very thankful. :)
Regards
Matej
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
-- "We learn from failure, not from success!"
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|