[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] DomU - network performance and possibilities (HVM, PVM, pci-passthru, stubdom, PV on HVM...)
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:42:15PM +0800, lei yang wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[1]pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > Matej: I didn't get your initial post to xen-users because I got > (automatically) unsubscribed > from the list, due to my email provider getting blacklisted because of > some spam problems, > but now I subscribed again.. > > To answer your questions: > > 1) No, it's not possible to use VirtIO with Xen. > 2) Yes, it's possible to use PV-on-HVM drivers in the guest with pvops > dom0. > > 3) Take a look at: > [2]http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenLinuxPVonHVMdrivers > > Did you already make some benchmarks? If you need good latency then I > think > PCI passthrough will help a lot there.. or Xen netchannel2. > > > > Which one will be better for thoughput, pci passthrogh or netchanel2? > pci passthrough. -- Pasi > Thanks > Lei > > > > -- Pasi > > Original email from Matej: > > Hi, > > I want to (need to) do a network performance analysis/benchmark of > various Xen networking solutions (analyzing the pros and cons of network > infrastructure virtualisation) on top of Xen 4.0. > > So far I have Xen 4.0 running with various Dom0 kernels (git stable > 2.6.32.11, git stable 2.6.31.13, mercurial 2.6.18.8, Debian distribution > 2.6.26-2xen...want try some newer forward ported Xen kernel too). > > AFAIK, there are these possibilities for DomU "architecture". > > 1. DomU as classic emulated HVM. > 2. DomU as classic PVM (pv_ops kernel and Xen kernel) > 3. DomU as classic emulated HVM with Xen PV drivers (don't know whether > these work with pv_ops Dom0, but for that case I have the 2.6.18.8 Xen > linux) > 4. DomU as classic PVM with pass-thru PCI NICs > 5. DomU as classic HVM with pass-thru PCI NICs (don't have IOMMU capable > HW :( ) > 6. DomU as HVM with stubdom (according to various papers, this should be > a bit faster than classic HVM DomU) > 7. DomU as HVM with virtio drivers (is this possible in xen4.0?) > > I'm interested in the latency and bandwidth performance in phys-DomU and > DomU-DomU scenarios (I have own tool for network latency benchmarking > and for bandwidth there's the Iperf :) ). Also I will try to experiment > a bit with the CPU pinning and schedulers in these scenarios. > > Also would like to test and testbench OpenSwitch as linux-bridge > replacement (but I'm afraid I will not have time for this). > > So my questions are: > > 1. Is possible to use VirtIO with XEN 4.0 (as another approach on the > PV-on-HVM)? > 2. Is possible to use the Xen HVM DomU PV drivers (unmodified drivers?) > with pvops Dom0? > 3. If you have some ideas or hints, I will be very thankful. :) > > Regards > > Matej > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > [3]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [4]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > -- > "We learn from failure, not from success!" > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx > 2. http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenLinuxPVonHVMdrivers > 3. mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 4. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |