[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] adios to XEN
- To: Bart Coninckx <bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Arpan Jindal <jindalarpan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:17:33 +0530
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 24 May 2010 02:49:04 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=UBV4EFr91KVJoEaIAg2jlbyaNFelzSY6jbZztyZnlquBmUyO/2HpoZ4PLLQ2Nrrf+S Ly6yO/iM8mvPDVigXtgV0mYQS1OfdULKgVDFVI4kR5Bpwh8a9UKny0R1YQ8bPeoatesV bZoK0jSNr+/x09/pg++ymjB1/M1xV/z+Uf34Y=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
well i was using RHEL 5.4 as base machine(dom0) and RHEL 5.2 as guest machine (domU)
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Bart Coninckx <bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Monday 24 May 2010 10:50:31 Arpan Jindal wrote:
> Hello All
>
> Finally after struggling for more than 3 weeks i have decided not us use
> XEN for virtualization. due to very very poor IO performance inside full
> virtualization.
>
> The VM's I was creating was intended for high volume of IO everyday.
>
> May be I was not able to configure it properly but i also did not get any
> way out to solve this issue.
>
> Note - The above comment is general and is based on my observation.
>
do you happen to have this problem with Windows guests?
I seem to get the impression that Xen (3.x) with Windows is not the best of
choices as far as performance is concerned. Am I wrong? Novell does offer a
(paied) driver pack to boost performance, maybe that's a decent "plan B".
Rgds,
Bart
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
