[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Really slow disk write on Ubuntu
- To: rudi <rudolone@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:38:24 -0300
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 24 May 2010 12:40:27 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ao0n/rit3iyJGV1SBPiK0Qw8LIScL2QLD/eGLnWPMMKjEgfn1eiyGrqfuKfda8IWeZ hiuLX1uetnxB5ffQczwq+q1CbqSM61ZwQoFGtdM0gNrFfw2dHYIzGWVDciW8tsg7+UX+ w7Ue6/eUWdMJ8HQxH4wl9aaDPvQlNqaNYQsIs=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
I have a lot of Ubuntu 10.04 as paravirtual machines on top of the Xen without any modifications, no patches needed.
On 24 May 2010 14:26, rudi <rudolone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David Markey wrote:
Why not use paravirtualise?
AFAIK paravirtualising Ubuntu is troublesome and requires a little work a the moment (a kernel patch and so on), so we did a quick test para-virtualising the standard "Oracle Enterprise Linux 5 64-bit" provided by Oracle, on top of Oracle-vm and running the same benchmarks.
Results were sligthly better but still far from our expectations. Disk writes around 10-15 MB/s.
My doubt is: should we expect much better results (and by consequence, there is a big misconfiguration/mistake somewhere in our stack) or these results are typical and unexceptional for this kind of systems?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
