[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] Ubuntu 10.04 stuck in detect_extended_topology()

  • To: <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "AP Xen" <apxeng@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:13:52 -0700
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:15:47 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=dUZXHECDQQzfY5GIApF8bbn2ghGOj3mhVYqHjukt6NxCXdoK9iwOWQ1wZfrdU/HYa/ 4kV+/PY7SVYNSTnolX6kBMPsxbjVyiHvCPkEetfl2F6Ks+ISv6yOtPWH5gTpnXW8cj7q D+XkIigzRXGKPBQL250MBVlAIzeJLgVXfxwB4=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcsH/geN9KPLsZBeRjStLsUatP7SAAAAPt7w

I have standardized on HVM and really don’t want to go the PV route. Alternatively, are you saying, do the install using PV and then switch to HVM?


From: David Markey [mailto:admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:03 AM
To: AP Xen
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Ubuntu 10.04 stuck in detect_extended_topology()


Is there a reason you cant use the PV installer?

On 9 June 2010 19:01, AP Xen <apxeng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am running Xen packaged with CentOS 5.4 and trying to install Ubuntu 10.04 as an HVM guest.


xen_major              : 3

xen_minor              : 1

xen_extra              : .2-164.11.1.el5


After sprinkling the kernel with printks, I am seeing that it is stuck in the function detect_extended_topology() in the following loop:


       sub_index = 1;

       do {

              cpuid_count(0xb, sub_index, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);

              printk("%s: after cpuid_count %d\n", __FUNCTION__, sub_index);



               * Check for the Core type in the implemented sub leaves.


              if (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) == CORE_TYPE) {

                     core_level_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);

                     core_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);





       } while (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) != INVALID_TYPE);



The ECX leaf subtype never returns CORE_TYPE or INVALID_TYPE. So think I might be running in to a bug / quirk in the CPUID handling code in Xen packaged with CentOS 5.4. Is there a work around for it? Maybe specifying something in the cpuid option in the config file.



Xen-users mailing list


Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.