On 06/09/2010 11:34 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:46:13AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets
wrote:
>
>> I've captured an exact error message in text virt-install console :-
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> error 2 reading header: cpio: Bad magic
>>
>> Running anaconda 13.42, the Fedora system installer - please wait.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
> I guess that means the file anaconda downloaded is corrupt.. ie. networking is broken.
>
I would expect that any cpio wrapped up in an rpm would have to go
through a number of layers of sha1/md5/signature/etc checking before the
cpio header gets checked. If its making its way through that and then
finding a bad magic in the cpio, it would seem to be memory or
disk
corruption.
J
> -- Pasi
>
>
>
>> Boris.
>> P.S. Xen 4.0.1-rc2-pre, 2.6.32.15 (the most recent commit)
>>
>> --- On Wed, 6/9/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <
pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <
pasik@xxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems with xen 4.0 with pvops kernel
>> 2.6.32.15
>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>>
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2010, 8:54 AM
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:47:42AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>> > I was able to virt-install F13 PV DomU in nographics mode under Xen
>> > 4.0.1-rc2-pre (2.6.32.15 pvops c2cb3df04eb3ff68d0de102b2acacc9b8616e659)
>> > at the point of
extracting data from Apache mirror at Dom0 on top of
>> > Ubuntu 10.04 ( text console mode message)
>> > -------------------------------------------------
>> > 2 extracting cpio errors. Bad Magic
>> > -------------------------------------------------
>> > However, virt-install proceeds further to promt "set up VNC at DomU"
>> > and completed successfully.
>> > VNC mode cannot pass through this extractions. It just hangs.
>> >
>>
>> Yeah, there's something weird going on..
>>
>> During the weekend I *think* I was successfully able to install
guests
>> when they didn't have vfb set up at all.. but when I set up vfb (ie. used virt-manager)
>> the VM's started acting weird.. network problems, and problems in general,
>> VM's freezing..
>>
>> I haven't had time to confirm that yet..
>>
>> -- Pasi
>>
>> > Boris.
>> >
>> > --- On Mon, 6/7/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[1]
pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <[2]
pasik@xxxxxx>
>> > Subject: Re:
[Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems with xen 4.0 with
>> > pvops kernel 2.6.32.15
>> > To: "Boris Derzhavets" <[3]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <[4]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,
>> > [5]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, [6]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > [7]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > Date: Monday, June 7, 2010, 3:55 AM
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:54:11AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>> > > Virt-install hangs attempting to retrieve updates.img from Apache
>> > Mirror
>> > > setup at Dom0
>> > > with kernel 2.6.32.15
>> > > It doesn't happen with 2.6.32.10 (12,14 final).
>> > > Environment Xen 4.0 Dom0 on top Ubuntu 10.04 Server. Libvirt
is
>> > 0.8.0 .
>> > > Attempting to virt-install F13 PV DomU in vnc mode.
>> > >
>> > > I believe that builds are consistent.
>> > > Runtime behavior is the same for .10, .14, .15. Seems to be
>> > communicating
>> > > problem between DomU and Dom0 during HTTP download.
>> > >
>> >
>> > I'm seeing PV domU network issues aswell.. when running Xen 4.0.0 on
>> >
Fedora 13.
>> > I'll have to dig more into it..
>> >
>> > -- Pasi
>> >
>> > > Boris.
>> > >
>> > > --- On Sun, 6/6/10, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[1][8]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[2][9]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
>> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users]
Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems with xen
>> > 4.0 with
>> > > pvops kernel 2.6.32.15
>> > > To: "Boris Derzhavets" <[3][10]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > Cc: [4][11]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > [5][12]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > > [6][13]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > Date: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 12:43 PM
>> > >
>> > > On 06/06/2010 03:19 AM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>> > > > Network issues when working with DomUs in 2.6.32.14 and finally
>> > been
>> > > > fixed,
>> > > > seem to appear again in 2.6.32.15. Reverting to back to
>> > xen/stable
-
>> > > > 2.6.32.10
>> > > > works as a fix again.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > There are no substantial differences between 2.6.32.14 and .15.
>> > If
>> > > there are any differences in behaviour between them, then I'd
>> > suspect
>> > > some inconsistency from boot to boot, or in your kernel build
>> >
process.
>> > >
>> > > J
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Boris
>> > > >
>> > > > --- On *Thu, 6/3/10, Luís Silva
>> > /<[1][7][14]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>/*
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>
>> > > >
>> > > > From: Luís Silva <[2][8][15]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems with
>> > xen 4.0
>> > > > with pvops kernel
>> > > > To: "Boris Derzhavets" <[3][9][16]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <[4][10][17]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,
>> > > > [5][11][18]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > [6][12][19]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > Date: Thursday, June 3, 2010, 6:20 AM
>> >
> >
>> > > > Hello,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for the suggestion, xen/stable works ok for me. Only
>> > > > problem is that I have to disable offload do get dhcp to
>> > work on
>> > > > domU, but the problem I described before doesn't exist in
>> > this
>> > > >
kernel. Later today I'm going to try a previous build I
>> > have based
>> > > > on stable-2.6.32.x (2.6.32.13) to check if it already had
>> > this
>> > > > problem or not and I'll post the results.
>> > > >
>> > > > Luís
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:26 -0700, Boris Derzhavets
wrote:
>> > > >> Could you,please, build and try 2.6.32.10 ( xen/stable) ?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Boris.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --- On *Wed, 6/2/10, Luís Silva
>> > > **/<[7][13][20]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>/*
>> > > >>
wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> From: Luís Silva <[8][14][21]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > >> Subject: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems with
>> > xen
>> > > >> 4.0 with pvops kernel
>> > > >>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <[9][15][22]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
>> > > >> Cc: [10][16][23]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > > [11][17][24]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > >> Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 2:53 PM
>> > >
>>
>> > > >> Hello,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 09:06 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>> On 06/02/2010 01:47 AM, Luís Silva wrote:
>> > > >>> > Hello,
>> > > >>> >
>> >
> >>> > I'm using the latest stable-2.6.32.x. I already
>> > tried
>> > > "ethtool -K
>> > > >>> > <bridge> tx off", but that didn't make any
>> > difference.
>> > > Also, this only
>> > > >>> > happen with pv, in hvm mode all works ok and the
>> > domU sees
>> > >
the arp
>> > > >>> > messages...
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Yes, ARP is a new twist on network problems. I'm
>> > guessing
>> > > you're using
>> > > >>> hvm without stubdoms, which means that its networking
>> > > originates from
>> > > >>>
qemu within dom0, whereas PV and HVM+stubdom comes
>> > via
>> > > netback.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >> Yes, when I mentioned hvm I was talking about hvm
>> > without
>> > > >> stubdoms. I haven't tried those yet.
>> > > >>> But aside from that,
I'm stumped. Are you running
>> > any
>> > > firewalls on
>> > > >>> either side? Can you try disabling all the offloads
>> > (tx,
>> > > rx, gso, tso)
>> > > >>> on all the relevent interfaces (bridge, netback,
>> > within the
>> > > guest) and
>> > > >>>
see if that changes anything?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> J
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Ok, this is the bridge interface:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> brctl
show
>> > > >> bridge name bridge id STP enabled
>> > interfaces
>> > > >> virbr0 8000.feffffffffff no vif1.0
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ifconfig virbr0
>> > > >> virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
>> >
c2:ef:67:2b:a4:23
>> > > >> inet addr:192.168.120.254
>> > Bcast:192.168.120.255
>> > > Mask:255.255.255.0
>> > > >> inet6 addr: fe80::c0ef:67ff:fe2b:a423/64
>> > Scope:Link
>> > > >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
>> > Metric:1
>> >
> >> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>> > frame:0
>> > > >> TX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>> > > carrier:0
>> > > >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> > > >> RX bytes:0 (0.0
>> > >
>> B)
>> > > >> TX bytes:4662 (4.6 KB)
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I'm not using firewall other than the rules defined by
>> > > >> libvirt. DomU has no firewall and the rules in dom0
>> > are only
>> > >
>> these (virbr0 is natted to the outside, virbr1 is
>> > routed. The
>> > > >> result is the same in either one of them):
>> > > >>
>> > > >> sudo iptables -L -n -v
>> > > >> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 241K packets, 53M bytes)
>> > > >> pkts bytes target prot opt in out
source
>> > > destination
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT udp -- virbr1 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:53
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- virbr1 *
>> >
0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:53
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT udp -- virbr1 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:67
>> > > >>
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- virbr1 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:67
>> > > >> 8 515 ACCEPT udp -- virbr0 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:53
>> > > >>
0 0
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ACCEPT tcp -- virbr0 * 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:53
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT udp -- virbr0 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0
udp dpt:67
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- virbr0 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:67
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
>> > > >> pkts bytes target
>> >
> >> prot
>> > > >> opt in out source destination
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * virbr1
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 192.168.121.0/24
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT
all -- virbr1 *
>> > > 192.168.121.0/24 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT all -- virbr1 virbr1
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > >> 0 0 REJECT
all -- * virbr1
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
>> > > >> 0 0 REJECT all -- virbr1 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
>> > > >> 13 3448
ACCEPT all -- * virbr0
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 192.168.120.0/24
>> > > >> state
>> > > >> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
>> > > >> 16 1374 ACCEPT all -- virbr0 *
>> > > 192.168.120.0/24 0.0.0.0/0
>> > >
>> 0 0 ACCEPT all -- virbr0 virbr0
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > >> 0 0 REJECT all -- * virbr0
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
>> > > >>
0 0 REJECT all --
>> > > >> virbr0
>> > > >> * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
>> > reject-with
>> > > icmp-port-unreachable
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 233K packets, 27M bytes)
>> > >
>> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
>> > > destination
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> And these are the various offload parameters as set at
>> > boot:
>> > >
>>
>> > > >> Offload parameters for virbr0:
>> > > >> rx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> tx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> scatter-gather: on
>> > > >> tcp-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> udp-fragmentation-offload: on
>> >
> >> generic-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> generic-receive-offload: off
>> > > >> large-receive-offload: off
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Offload parameters for vif1.0:
>> > > >> rx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> tx-checksumming:
on
>> > > >> scatter-gather: on
>> > > >> tcp-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> udp-fragmentation-offload: off
>> > > >> generic-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> generic-receive-offload: off
>> > > >> large-receive-offload: off
>> >
> >>
>> > > >> Offload parameters for eth0:
>> > > >> rx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> tx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> scatter-gather: on
>> > > >> tcp-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> udp-fragmentation-offload:
off
>> > > >> generic-segmentation-offload: off
>> > > >> generic-receive-offload: off
>> > > >> large-receive-offload: off
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> To disable all checksuming I run the following
>> >
commands:
>> > > >> dom0:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> sudo ethtool -K virbr0 tx off sg off tso off gso off
>> > gro off
>> > > >> sudo ethtool -K vif1.0 tx off sg off tso off gso off
>> > gro off
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> domU
>> > > >>
>> > > >> sudo ethtool -K eth0 tx off sg off tso off gso off gro
>> > off
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> This managed to get all parameter to off in the
>> > mentioned
>> > >
>> interfaces, but unfortunately the result is the same.
>> > The arp
>> > > >> requests get to vif1.0, but not to eth0 on the domU.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> sudo tcpdump -i vif1.0 -n -vv arp
>> > > >> tcpdump: WARNING: vif1.0: no IPv4 address assigned
>> > > >> tcpdump: listening on vif1.0, link-type
EN10MB
>> > (Ethernet),
>> > > capture size 96 bytes
>> > > >> 19:43:51.233378 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >> 19:43:52.233164 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> >
> >> 19:43:53.233166 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >> 19:43:54.684214 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >> 19:43:55.684218 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4),
>> >
Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >> 19:43:56.684232 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I hope this information is enough. If I can
provide
>> > anything
>> > > >> else to help debug or test, please just ask! ;)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks in advance,
>> > > >> Luís
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >
Thanks,
>> > > >>> > Luís
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 18:20 -0700, Jeremy
>> > Fitzhardinge
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>> >> On 06/01/2010 05:38 PM, Luís Silva wrote:
>> > > >>> >> >
Hello,
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Finally I managed to get a xen 4.0 working on
>> > ubuntu
>> > > 10.04 with pvops
>> > > >>> >> > kernel and libvirt. However I am having some
>> > problems
>> > > with
>> > > >>>
>> > networking... after initial installation with
>> > > netinstall image in hvm
>> > > >>> >> > mode, when I transform the vm in xen pv (via
>> > pygrub
>> > > with the current
>> > > >>> >> > ubuntu kernel), networking startEd to act
>> > weird...
>> > > >>> >> >
>> >
> >>> >> > Basically I'm not using a network script from
>> > xen. I
>> > > define a bridge
>> > > >>> >> > (manually or via libvirt, the result is the
>> > same) and I
>> > > use vif-bridge
>> > > >>> >> > to connect the vif to it. But now the weird part
>> > comes:
>> > >
I can
>> > > >>> >> > communicate from domU to dom0, but not the other
>> > way
>> > > >>> around,
>> > > >>> unless I
>> > > >>> >> > keep a ping running from domU to dom0... That's
>> > right,
>> > > weird... while
>> > >
>>> >> > trying the ping from dom0 to domU, I used
>> > tcpdump both
>> > > on the bridge,
>> > > >>> >> > on the vif and on the eth0 in the domU. The arp
>> > packets
>> > > never get to
>> > > >>> >> > domU, but they appear both in the bridge and the
>> > vif
>> > >
sniff's...
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> What version of kernel are you using in dom0 and
>> > domU?
>> > > There was a
>> > > >>> >> netback bug which caused problems with dom0<->domU
>> > > communication, but it
>> > > >>> >> has been fixed for a while in 2.6.32 (but
only
>> > recently
>> > > in .31). The
>> > > >>> >> workaround is to disable tx checksum offload on
>> > your
>> > > bridge (ethtool -K
>> > > >>> >> <bridge> tx off).
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>
J
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Here is the bridge:
>> > > >>> >> > ifconfig virbr0
>> > > >>> >> > virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
>> > > fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> >
> >>> >> >
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> inet addr:192.168.120.254 Bcast:192.168.120.255
>> > > Mask:255.255.255.0
>> > > >>> >> > inet6 addr:
>> > fe80::7cee:4bff:fe82:e63f/64
>> > > Scope:Link
>> > > >>>
>> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST
>> > MTU:1500
>> > > Metric:1
>> > > >>> >> > RX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0
>> > overruns:0
>> > > frame:0
>> > > >>> >> > TX packets:226 errors:0 dropped:0
>> > overruns:0
>> >
> carrier:0
>> > > >>> >> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> > > >>> >> > RX bytes:952 (952.0 B) TX bytes:13953
>> > (13.9
>> > > KB)
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> >
> >>> >> > brctl show
>> > > >>> >> > bridge name bridge id STP enabled
>> > > interfaces
>> > > >>> >> > virbr0 8000.feffffffffff no
>> > vif5.0
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>>
>> >
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump -i virbr0 -vv -n
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump: listening on virbr0, link-type EN10MB
>> > > (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:25.945151 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF],
>> > > >>>
proto ICMP (1),
>> > > >>> length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 1, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:26.945361 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> >
> >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 2, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:27.945420 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP echo
>> >
request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 3, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:28.945362 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 4, length 64
>> > > >>>
>> > 01:31:29.945364 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317,
>> > > >>> seq 5, length
>> > > >>> 64
>> >
> >>> >> > 01:31:30.944300 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:30.945359 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP echo
>> >
request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 6, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:31.944297 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:31.945444 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > >
>>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 7, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:32.944294 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:32.945401 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset
0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP echo request,
>> > id
>> > > 10317, seq 8, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:33.947293 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> >
4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:34.947373 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:35.947353 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length
28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:37.948352 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:38.948399 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:39.948376 ARP, Ethernet (len
6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:40.949356 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request
>> > > >>> who-has
>> > > >>> 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>>
>> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump -i vif5.0 -vv -n
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump: WARNING: vif5.0: no IPv4 address
>> > assigned
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump: listening on vif5.0, link-type EN10MB
>> > > (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
>> >
> >>> >> > 01:32:19.956358 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:20.956358 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:21.956359 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> >
4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:23.957311 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:24.957312 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254,
length
>> > > >>> 28
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> 01:32:25.957359 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:27.958360 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell
192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:28.958310 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:29.958362 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >>
>
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Forwarding and iptables don't seem to be the
>> > problem,
>> > > because if I
>> > > >>> >> > initiate a ping from domU (at the same time as
>> > the
>> > >
failing one from
>> > > >>> >> > dom0), the ping in dom0 starts to work. As soon
>> > as I
>> > > stop the ping in
>> > > >>> >> > domU, the one in dom0 starts failing again...
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Is anyone having the same
>> > > >>>
problem? Is this a bug
>> > > >>> in the kernel? In
>> > > >>> >> > dom0 or domU?
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Thanks in advance,
>> > > >>> >> > Luís
>> > > >>> >>
>
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> > > >>> >> > Xen-devel mailing list
>> > > >>> >> > [12][18][25]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > <mailto:[13][19][26]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > <mailto:[14][20][27]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > >>> >> > [15][21][28]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >>
>> > >
>>> >>
>> > > >>> >> _______________________________________________
>> > > >>> >> Xen-devel mailing list
>> > > >>> >> [16][22][29]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > <mailto:[17][23][30]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > <mailto:[18][24][31]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > >>> >> [19][25][32]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>>
>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
_______________________________________________
>> > > >> Xen-users mailing list
>> > > >> [20][26][33]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > >> [21][27][34]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> >
> >
>> > > >
>> > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > Xen-users mailing list
>> > > > [22][28][35]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > >
> </mc/compose?to=[23][29][36]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > [24][30][37]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > References
>> > >
>> > > Visible links
>> > > 1.
file:///mc/compose?to=[31][38]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 2. file:///mc/compose?to=[32][39]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 3. file:///mc/compose?to=[33][40]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> > > 4. file:///mc/compose?to=[34][41]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> > > 5. file:///mc/compose?to=[35][42]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 6. file:///mc/compose?to=[36][43]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 7. file:///mc/compose?to=[37][44]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 8. file:///mc/compose?to=[38][45]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 9. file:///mc/compose?to=[39][46]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> > > 10. file:///mc/compose?to=[40][47]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 11. file:///mc/compose?to=[41][48]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 12. file:///mc/compose?to=[42][49]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 13. file:///mc/compose?to=[43][50]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 14. file:///mc/compose?to=[44][51]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 15. [45][52]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> > > 16. file:///mc/compose?to=[46][53]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 17. file:///mc/compose?to=[47][54]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 18. file:///mc/compose?to=[48][55]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 19. [49][56]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> > > 20. file:///mc/compose?to=[50][57]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 21. [51][58]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> > > 22. file:///mc/compose?to=[52][59]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 23. file:///mc/compose?to=[53][60]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > 24. [54][61]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Xen-devel mailing
list
>> > > [55][62]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > [56][63]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Xen-devel mailing list
>> > [57][64]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > [58][65]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> >
>> > References
>> >
>> > Visible links
>> > 1. file:///mc/compose?to=[66]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> > 2. file:///mc/compose?to=[67]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> > 3. file:///mc/compose?to=[68]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> > 4. file:///mc/compose?to=[69]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 5. file:///mc/compose?to=[70]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 6. file:///mc/compose?to=[71]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 7. file:///mc/compose?to=[72]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 8. file:///mc/compose?to=[73]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 9.
file:///mc/compose?to=[74]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> > 10. file:///mc/compose?to=[75]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> > 11. file:///mc/compose?to=[76]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 12. file:///mc/compose?to=[77]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 13. file:///mc/compose?to=[78]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 14. file:///mc/compose?to=[79]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 15. file:///mc/compose?to=[80]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> > 16. file:///mc/compose?to=[81]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 17. file:///mc/compose?to=[82]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 18.
file:///mc/compose?to=[83]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 19. file:///mc/compose?to=[84]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 20. file:///mc/compose?to=[85]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 21. [86]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> > 22. file:///mc/compose?to=[87]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 23. file:///mc/compose?to=[88]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 24. file:///mc/compose?to=[89]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 25. [90]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> > 26. file:///mc/compose?to=[91]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 27. [92]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> > 28. file:///mc/compose?to=[93]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 29. file:///mc/compose?to=[94]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 30. [95]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> > 31. file:///mc/compose?to=[96]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 32.
file:///mc/compose?to=[97]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 33. file:///mc/compose?to=[98]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> > 34. file:///mc/compose?to=[99]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> > 35. file:///mc/compose?to=[100]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 36. file:///mc/compose?to=[101]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 37. file:///mc/compose?to=[102]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 38. file:///mc/compose?to=[103]
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 39. file:///mc/compose?to=[104]
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> > 40. file:///mc/compose?to=[105]
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 41.
file:///mc/compose?to=[106]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 42. file:///mc/compose?to=[107]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 43. file:///mc/compose?to=[108]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 44. file:///mc/compose?to=[109]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 45. [110]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> > 46. file:///mc/compose?to=[111]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 47. file:///mc/compose?to=[112]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 48. file:///mc/compose?to=[113]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 49. [114]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> > 50. file:///mc/compose?to=[115]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 51. [116]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> > 52. file:///mc/compose?to=[117]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 53. file:///mc/compose?to=[118]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 54. [119]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> > 55.
file:///mc/compose?to=[120]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 56. [121]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> > 57. file:///mc/compose?to=[122]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > 58. [123]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> [124]
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> [125]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>>
>> References
>>
>> Visible links
>> 1. file:///mc/compose?to=
pasik@xxxxxx>> 2. file:///mc/compose?to=
pasik@xxxxxx>> 3. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> 4. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 5. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 6. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 7. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 8. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 9. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 10. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> 11. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 12. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 13. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 14. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 15. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 16. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> 17. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 18. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 19. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 20. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 21. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 22. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 23. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 24. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 25. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 26. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 27. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 28.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 29. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 30. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 31. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 32.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 33. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 34.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> 35. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 36.
file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 37.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> 38. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 39. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 40. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> 41. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 42. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 43. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 44. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 45. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 46. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 47. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 48. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 49. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 50. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 51. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 52.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 53. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 54. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 55. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 56.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 57.
file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 58.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> 59. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 60. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 61.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> 62. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 63.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 64. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 65.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 66. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 67. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 68. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> 69. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 70. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 71. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 72. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 73. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 74. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> 75. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 76. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 77. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 78. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 79. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 80. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 81. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 82. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 83. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 84. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 85. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 86.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 87. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 88. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 89. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 90.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 91. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 92.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> 93. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 94.
file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 95.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> 96. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 97. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 98. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>> 99. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 100. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 101. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 102. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 103. file:///mc/compose?to=
luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 104. file:///mc/compose?to=
jeremy@xxxxxxxx>> 105. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 106. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 107. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 108. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 109. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 110.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 111. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 112. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 113. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 114.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 115. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 116.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> 117. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 118. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 119.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>> 120. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 121.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 122. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 123.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>> 124. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 125.
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel>>
>
