[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM


  • To: "Serge Fonville" <serge.fonville@xxxxxxxxx>, <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Jonathan Tripathy" <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:59:26 +0100
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:02:56 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcsL2hyxpbsdE1EbTTy44+VdGm0SMAAAHPaM
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM



From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Serge Fonville
Sent: Mon 14/06/2010 16:53
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM

Hi

>> I am going to get a storage server which will be connected to my Xen
>> hosts via iSCSI/Ethernet. I wish to use LVM for the DomU disks. The
>> storage server will have a RAID10 array, and 2 Xen hosts will connect
>> to this (Each will have a 50% share of the RAID10 array, space wise).
>>
>> What is the best way to go about this? Should I:
>>
>> a) Split the RAID10 array into 2 partition on the storage server, and
>> export 1 partition to each xen host, then let the Xen host manage LVM?
>>
>> or
>>
>> b) Do all LVM stuff on the storage server and export each LVM logical
>> volume to the correct Xen hosts via iSCSI? Since each host could have
>> around 100 VMs on it, that's a lot of iSCSI exporting!
>>
> If you export two "big luns" and do the LVM stuff on each Xens server
> you will not be able to "switch" a VM from one server to the other (with
> xm save/restore for example). With that setup a VM can only be started
> on a specific server. Also you will have two LVM sets to manage.
>
> If you do all the storage management on your SAN migrate a VM from one
> server to the other will be easy and even done "live". Also the storage
> management will be "unified". The only problem could be the maximum
> number of iSCSI Luns on yours SAN, but it often is greater than 127
> distinct units.
>
> Ok thanks for the advice. So I think I shall go down the root of doing all
> LVM stuff on the SAN.
>
> However, I think that I will need more than 127 virtual machines, so having
> an iSCSI target per VM is probably not an option. Is there any other
> solution for Ubuntu/Debian?

Would it be an option to have one iSCSI target, used by multiple
clients where only one clients accesses a directory at a time??
that way it would be way easier to mgrate a vm from one host to another.

HTH

Regards,

Serge Fonville

--
http://www.sergefonville.nl

Convince Google!!
They need to support Adsense over SSL
https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=10528
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=1884bc9310d9f923&hl=en

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So you're saying that I could just have one bug LUN, which both xen hosts could connect to, and as long as each host didn't try to run the same DomU as the same time, I'd be ok? Is this safe and done in industry?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.