[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen version for production environment.


  • To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Ronaldo C. A. Chaves" <xarqui@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:56:55 -0300
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:58:32 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nRxIWN/UN8OUGM2UhDzDFE3jsey+HmqEM3cjmZtvLb0KNXLXxU3SYVBGvUXrcr/Arf FQORAfxBUniD6IpJ5TUbE5GuGtUYCtLuqtQXzS+DZbFiKT3bewvr+A8dKaeNkeBCXH+C ZCnzca3htbyLDtpKWYtbAVC0UpYoKPD4qCXI0=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Yes, Xen 3.4.3 or Xen 4.0.0?
Kernel 2.6.18-8 or 2.6.31/2.6.32?

Ronaldo.

2010/8/25 Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ronaldo C. A. Chaves <xarqui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> what is the most stable version of xen and kernel for a production
> environment?

Most stable?
IMHO that would be RHEL/Centos version, with its bunded Xen.

--
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.