[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Xen version for production environment.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ronaldo C. A. Chaves <xarqui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, Xen 3.4.3 or Xen 4.0.0? > Kernel 2.6.18-8 or 2.6.31/2.6.32? None of them. You asked for the one most stable. RHEL5 currently comes with its own version of Xen, based on well-tested Xen 3.1.2 plus lots of RH patches. It's kernel is based on 2.6.18, but also with lots of RH patches so it has some newer kernel features (like ext4). Redhat actively maintain this version to have the latest security and bug fix for the life time of RHEL5, and it works great for common uses (with Windows/Linux domUs). That being said, If you use some kind of domU (like Solaris or opensolaris), you might need newer Xen version. For this purpose you can install a packaged version of Xen 3.4.3 for RHEL from http://www.gitco.de/repo/ that should just work. Xen 4.0 and pv_ops kernel (based on 2.6.32) or Suse xen kernel (2.6.34) has more features (like blktap2), but it's also not as well-tested, so you might find some bugs here and there. Personally I have a dev system with RHEL5/Xen-4.0/2.6.34 kernel + http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/detail?name=xen-patches-2.6.34-1.tar.bz2&can=2&q= If you don't want to bother with dom0 OS selection, you could go down XenServer and XCP (the dev version) path, like David suggested. -- Fajar > > Ronaldo. > > 2010/8/25 Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ronaldo C. A. Chaves <xarqui@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > what is the most stable version of xen and kernel for a production >> > environment? >> >> Most stable? >> IMHO that would be RHEL/Centos version, with its bunded Xen. >> >> -- >> Fajar > > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |