Re: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers

[Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:01:14PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pasi Kärkkäinen [mailto:pasik@xxxxxx]
> > Sent: 07 September 2010 14:46
> > To: Paul Durrant
> > Cc: Giovanni Bellac; Ian Campbell; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support
> > for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:26:04PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > >    Presumably the tools are creating a /local/domain/3/console/0
> > entry if you
> > >    don't specify VNC; it's another example of the same issue you
> > saw before.
> > >
> > >    The Citrix PV drivers are not routinely tested on xen-unstable;
> > you need
> > >    to tweak your tools to give them the environment they expect
> > (which is
> > >    that the only thing under /local/domain/XXX/device are vbd and
> > vif nodes).
> > >
> > 
> > I guess the behaviour of Citrix PV drivers has changed recently?
> > The drivers from XCP 0.1.x worked OK on Xen 4.0 earlier..
> > 
> 
> I don't think so. I think the fe close code has been static for a while, 
> whereas the tools, mostly libxl, have seen massive churn of late.
> 

Yeah, libxl has had a lot of changes, but the user in question was using xm..

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users