[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel
- To: xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:51:26 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eUGkmXuyR+Q3rLR0t81FJOgzPiyLzGZ8CsC9nHUPXRrsy6biAVhRqwTnZK7nT+fmwWXZ4QDrk4KnUQrHVj0QQTsUMuVx7e5vaUOuqrWIiZFo+wAFXhyYnbM8759uIw6jbypt2VtjT//Wt2beTYaRwdbsVipbXHJRyxpW2O/cG1o=;
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Just wondering why kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot make itself into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora's Libvirt has the best compatibility with Xen 4.0.1. It's not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7 aka Suse is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops kernel about 15-20 % under Xen 4.0.1. I don't mention KVM performance. It's not a competitor for OpenSuse 11.3 after the most recent "zypper update"
Boris.
--- On Mon, 10/18/10, M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: M A Young
<m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build To: xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 6:17 AM
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|