[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] Linux DomU vs Bare Metal performance issues
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Watts > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 2:40 PM > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Xen-users] Linux DomU vs Bare Metal performance issues > > Can anyone shed any light on why I see such a drop in performance between these > two servers? I could understand, to an extent, seeing the DomU getting 3/4 of the > performance of the bare metal server given it has one CPU less, but this is less than > 1/2 the performance. Understand what you're really testing here is the performance of the virtual network driver, since Apache does almost no work to serve a simple static page. You're exercising the TCP stack and network drivers more than anything else. Out of curiosity, can you easily run the same test against dom0? The dom0 runs a Xen kernel, on top of the hypervisor, but with a physical network interface (rather than virtual). One thing you can try is to pin the dom0 and/or domU to a physical core, using "xm vcpu-pin". That gave me better throughput on some of my tests. (I have doubts that hyperthreading scales as well as multicore processors, however I don't have any hyperthreaded systems of my own to test.) Jeff _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |