[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] redhat native vs. redhat on XCP
- To: Boris Quiroz <bquiroz.work@xxxxxxxxx>, xenList <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Henrik Andersson <henrik.j.andersson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:17:37 +0200
- Cc:
- Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:18:27 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=p8VE5K6KUKoWSheZn56J+kYdL4H1UCv1QGY3a+OegNU1BpbrLkukD9V7+y0fxv7U1B ndt9ja9q3pt/FkCPuKImbxNnq++4vp6/2qTt7qefdm2KXoGbhryrfztygSMYMHBXQ1kH rlliMo4/2dFFLN/LdvGy8MFLN2KiTYX9q8DJ0=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
What makes you think that adding a virtualization layer to the picture would increase the performance? Would be bit odd to have same operating system perform better when it is run on a virtual machine.
-Henrik Andersson On 12 January 2011 22:13, Boris Quiroz <bquiroz.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi list,
Next week I'll receive a couple of IBM M2 servers. The team wanted to
test a DomU with RHEL 5 virtualized on XCP vs a RHEL 5 native,
installed directly to the servers. Does anybody has done this test
before?
We'll test a java web application (online banking), and we basically
want to see which environment will process more TPS (transactions per
second), which is directly related to disk I/O. Both servers has
identical hardware, with 15k rpm disks.
Do I have to modify something in the XCP config? I think (and want)
XCP will win.. What should I expect? Will the difference in TPS be
notorious?
Thanks.
--
@cereal_bars
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
