Re: [Xen-users] NIC bonding - missing eth0?

["Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Smithies, Russell
<Russell.Smithies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It’s always eth0 that shows a different aggregator ID. Changing the cables
> around so it hits a different port on the switch makes no difference. The
> switch is correctly configured for the port channel.
>
> The only difference between the 2 servers is one is running Xen
> (kernel-xen-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.centos.plus) so I have the usual virtual
> interfaces and bridges.
>
>
>
> Any ideas what might be happening?
>
> Is something that needs to be “fixed” or is it not really a problem?

> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 1C:C1:DE:74:97:5C
> peth0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF

The presence of "peth0" shows you still use the default xend's
network-bridge script. Comment it out from /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp,
and create bridges manually on top of your bonding using OS config
files (/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br*). There's a recent
example on this list (with vlans on top of bonding) from Donny Brooks,
search the archive if you need it.

-- 
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users