Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in.

[Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>]

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> 
> Friday, May 13, 2011, 6:49:27 PM, you wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:46:18AM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
> >> Great work everyone. :)
> 
> > Combined with this week acceptance of Xen in upstream QEMU, and I think
> > that the majority of folks on xen-devel are going to have a hard hangover
> > on Monday :-)
> 
> Cheers and thx all ! :-)
> 
> >> 
> >> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major
> >> milestone to be pushed upstream?
> 
> > There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is 
> > important
> > since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.
> 
> A semi one for me personally would be acpi-processor stuff to make xenpm work.
> But having blkback would make it at least ok to test for some longer period 
> :-)
> 

At Xen Hack-a-tron two months ago Jeremy was mentioning pvops acpi patches..

Jeremy: Any plans for submitting those upstream? 

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel