Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in.

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

On 05/15/2011 08:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Friday, May 13, 2011, 6:49:27 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:46:18AM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
>>>> Great work everyone. :)
>>> Combined with this week acceptance of Xen in upstream QEMU, and I think
>>> that the majority of folks on xen-devel are going to have a hard hangover
>>> on Monday :-)
>> Cheers and thx all ! :-)
>>
>>>> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major
>>>> milestone to be pushed upstream?
>>> There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is 
>>> important
>>> since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.
>> A semi one for me personally would be acpi-processor stuff to make xenpm 
>> work.
>> But having blkback would make it at least ok to test for some longer period 
>> :-)
>>
> At Xen Hack-a-tron two months ago Jeremy was mentioning pvops acpi patches..
>
> Jeremy: Any plans for submitting those upstream? 

Konrad has a set of acpi patches from the Virtual Computer folks I think.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel