RE: [Xen-users] Configuring xen bridges and networking issues

[Larry Ing <larry@xxxxxxxx>]

Okay, I commented out my eth0 configuration and yet Debian(dom0) is
unable to talk to the network.  Is there something I am missing?  I do
have a similar bridge configuration. 

On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 04:12 +0200, Walter Robert Ditzler wrote:
> no, eth0 is not directly defined, only enheritanced by br0. bellow my entire 
> interface confih. I have 2 nic's in my hp dl 320g6 server:
> 
> ***
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
> 
> auto br0
> iface br0 inet static
>         address         10.41.10.41
>         netmask         255.255.255.0
>         network         10.41.10.0
>         broadcast       10.41.10.255
>         gateway         10.41.10.1
>         bridge_ports    eth0
>         bridge_stp      on
>         bridge_maxwait  0
> 
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
>         address         10.255.255.1
>         netmask         255.255.255.252
>         network         10.255.255.0
>         broadcast       10.255.255.3
> ***
> 
> eth1 I only use for drbd sync and remus.
> 
> thanks walter
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Ing [mailto:larry@xxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Montag, 1. August 2011 03:54
> To: Walter Robert Ditzler
> Cc: 'xenList'
> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Configuring xen bridges and networking issues
> 
> Hmm... I assume you still have eth0 defined as something like this
> 
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
>       address 192.168.1.100
>       netmask 255.255.255.0
>       network 192.168.1.0
>       broadcast 192.168.1.255
>       gateway 192.168.1.1
> 
> If that is the case, I can't make my host talk to the network.
> 
> this is my configuration:
> 
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
>       address 192.168.1.100
>       netmask 255.255.255.0
>       network 192.168.1.0
>       broadcast 192.168.1.255
>       gateway 192.168.1.1
> auto br0
> iface br0 inet static
>         address         10.10.10.100
>         netmask         255.255.255.0
>         network         10.10.10.0
>         broadcast       10.10.10.255
>         gateway         10.10.10.1
>         bridge_ports    eth0
>         bridge_stp      on
>         bridge_maxwait  0
> 
> As far as switching distros... I would rather not considering I know debian 
> better than any other distro.
> 
> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 03:35 +0200, Walter Robert Ditzler wrote:
> > why changing distribution, debian does it very well. for performance 
> > reason I just defined a bridged interface:
> > 
> > auto br0
> > iface br0 inet static
> >         address         10.41.10.41
> >         netmask         255.255.255.0
> >         network         10.41.10.0
> >         broadcast       10.41.10.255
> >         gateway         10.41.10.1
> >         bridge_ports    eth0
> >         bridge_stp      on
> >         bridge_maxwait  0
> > 
> > 
> > vif             = [ 'bridge=br0,mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx' ]
> > 
> > (network-script 'network-bridge antispoof=yes') (vif-script 
> > vif-bridge)
> > 
> > thanks walter
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tapas 
> > Mishra
> > Sent: Montag, 1. August 2011 03:16
> > To: Larry Ing
> > Cc: xenList
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Configuring xen bridges and networking issues
> > 
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Larry Ing <larry@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I am trying to use bridged networking with my Xen VMs, but I am 
> > > unable to connect them to the network.  I am running a Debian dom0 
> > > with Xen 4.0.1.  I am not seeing a xenbr0 interface in the output of 
> > > "ifconfig", but I do see peth0 and eth0.  Running the command "brctl 
> > > show" tells me that eth0 is the bridge device.  In my 
> > > xend-config.sxp I did not name it eth0, but instead said the 
> > > following "(network-script 'network-bridge antispoof=yes 
> > > bridge=xenbr0')."  How do I create the xenbr0 interface and have my 
> > > VMs successfully connect to
> > this bridge?
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > Though I did use Debian also in past but it simply has made things 
> > more difficult to do.
> > There is some thing known as virt-viewer install it on your Debian and 
> > create all your VMs and their settings etc from there.My sincere 
> > suggestion to you will be to go with CentOS or some thing RHEL kind of 
> > thing if you are newbie.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users