Re: [Xen-users] any recent experience combining GlusterFS w/ Xen?

[Scott Damron <sdamron@xxxxxxxxx>]

I looked at them a while back.  The first "Preview" release was based
on Debain, then when I went to upgrade, it was based on CentOS...what
a PITA!  the 40 CPU free license was good though.

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:06 PM, dwight at supercomputer.org
<dwight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 February 2012 01:30:58 pm Miles Fidelman wrote:
>> Florian Heigl wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > 2012/2/15 Miles Fidelman<mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >> Anybody have any recent experience they could share along these
>> >> lines?
>> >
>> > If nobody reponds, look in the list archives. I doubt you will
>> > find many people recommend it.
>>
>> I've seen some comments in the archives relating to previous
>> versions of Gluster, particularly around resynchronization delays
>> that can effect VM migration - things that purport to be fixed in
>> later versions.  And... RedHat seems to be pushing some
>> Gluster-based appliances for use in a virtualized environment.
>>
>> Hence my interest in RECENT experience :-)
>
> That's interesting. FWIW, I'm evaluating Nimbula right now, and they
> claim that they are using Gluster along with DRBD. They are
> CentOS/RH based, so that fits in with your comment about RedHat.
> Can't say yet how well it works though.
>
>        -dwight-
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users